the decision must wait will we have settled The Merchant Shipping Grobce, but
?
Blake and
meamotule send to Sin #
that this is and
rapt for.
That we premme
say
the question.
1577.
Bhuttake
Mr Lufas, abunge, 49 ahme54749 See you mipute
-notebaker attached to ₤2.038/2.
Do you know whether Ihr 86 / Blake
that all junks lifened dongkong shotild fly the British or
means
•the
Sir H Blake wither to
pinkly after spicking to mo
85228900
Johnner
at
Ein H Blake's letter is attebed-
As I oppond the B of T anggrobin muhaly regations Sie H Blakin pagoval. I have proposed action
28900.
J.Ing
20382
23783
27373
L (1)~-50854-3000-12-01
M Lucas
This
501
quertin of the ching-fir bax
still remains to be dealt with.
The
HangKong Chamber
of Commerce drew attention to the fact that certain gunks evacked this bax (which is payable
certain
ashiles imported in native bottoms) by adspend
obtaining authorisation to fly German
flags.
iTu
a
American
This the despatch sending this have
very ambigums, but it
avas
inferred that
fum trangKong
(1) the junks traded, (2) the British Trader
law from making
purpose
not lean)
bray
(3) the
are
were
- precluded by
of the flay for the
(though what this meant was
only aggestion
to check the punchier
that refusal to grant breences to junkes chimming the protection of forage flags.
Sie 4 Blake agred that
A
license
should be refused to any junk owned by Chiriere and Flying a Foreign Flag.
requand
70 agood
The Bof I agreed, punded that the applicable to all junks (including
Birkih) flying flags other than Chinese.
This appeared to be
te
directly contrary to Sie to Blake's because
proprial,
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.